Mother of Flies (John & Zelda Adams, Toby Poser, 2026): 3/5
From the “Adams Family,” the independent husband/wife/daughter team who made Hellbender a couple of years ago (I was a fan). They write their movies, shoot them, star in them, and compose the music. This is another witch movie, but this time in the key of dread. Powerful and visceral. So much of horror is just about cheap thrills. For example, I turned off the eventful but frankly boring Ready or Not 2 after a half hour. By contrast, this is about as heavy as a black hole.
* Michael (Antoine Fuqua, 2026): 2/5
So help me, Jack dragged me to see this. And the first hour is undeniably entertaining, since it follows my beloved young-person-who-successfully-becomes-a-musician plot beats. The strange thing is that, over and over, the film goes out of its way to normalize Michael—answering objections that no one on-screen is articulating (but that the audience can be counted on to have in their head). Oh yes, see: Michael really does have vitiligo. And see: he saves Bubbles from an abusive situation analogous his own. And see: after his time in the burn ward he realized he related to and liked hanging out with young kids.
The Baker’s Wife (Marcel Pagnol, 1938): 5/5
A superbly droll and warm screwball comedy of remarriage, where the re-establishment of the relationship also knits together a whole community as they join forces to heal the rift. Full of forgiveness and love for all the characters. It knits Sturges’ “acting troupe full of characters” energy, Ford’s sense of getting to know a whole town, and Kaurismäki’s lovely sadness and drunkenness.
Pagnol’s Marseille Trilogy
Pagnol provided the scripts (based on his popular plays), but he didn’t feel he had the directorial experience to bring them to screen himself until the third. These are an excellent example of something I’m always looking for: the “novelistic” film. Which in this case means a film (or here a series of films) where things happen to the characters that fundamentally change them, and then we continue on to see how they will change next. Films where time itself is part of the drama: people age, values shift, families fracture, fortunes rise and fall.
Marius (Alexander Korda, 1931): 4/5
A film about a large community, their youthful dreams, their conformity, their pride, their contradictory desires—all told with maximum understanding and forgiveness, where disagreements flare up and are reconciled with Pagnol’s great forgiving and loving eye. All is topped with a highly emotional climax, as our title character chooses (incorrectly) between Fanny and the life at sea he has always dreamed of.
Fanny (Marc Allégret, 1932): 3.5/5
Picks up just where Marius left off, but in a more melodramatic tone. The highlights of the film are two long scenes that demonstrate that a film’s stage origins can be to its advantage, as a single location brings emotional intensity. A 27-minute scene in the middle of the film has three characters put through wide swings of emotion as they move from one opinion to its opposite and they come to reconciliation (though not with Marius). Simply beautiful writing and acting. Then the last 25 minutes are also composed of a single, complex scene where emotions flow and the characters change as viewpoints are exchanged. Not a Superman-style punch in sight.
César (Marcel Pagnol, 1936): 3/5
Jumps ahead 20 years to examine how the events of the previous two films affected the characters’ lives—and sets up a long-promised reconciliation with Marius. As with The Baker’s Wife, it’s a pleasure to hang out with the powerful lead actors and colorful side characters in Pagnol’s troupe.
These Three (William Wyler, 1936): 3/5
Wyler’s first attempt at adapting The Children’s Hour, which unfortunately makes no mention of lesbianism (the Hays code didn’t allow it). Instead, the women are simply accused of being in a love triangle. And who could blame them? As a cool doctor here, Joel McCrea is a fucking snack.
The Children’s Hour (William Wyler, 1961): 4/5
The coming out scene is the heart of the film, and Shirley MacLaine secures a spot in my acting pantheon. In this version, the accusation is a catalyst for MacLaine’s character accepting who she is for the first time. The suicide is a powerful catharsis, but it sucks—since it makes being a lesbian a terminal case. And I just don’t understand the final shots of Audrey Hepburn marching determinedly down a road. What is she thinking? Why does she look triumphant or even hopeful about the future?
The Collector (William Wyler, 1965): 3/5
Wyler endeavors to adapt to the new psychological and sexual anxieties/complexities of the 1960s. He reportedly turned down The Sound of Music to make this perverse and disturbing thriller, just six years after making Ben-Hur. Using his suit and tie as emotional armor, Terrence Stamp’s title character is Bateman-esque—and the film is Hitchcockian in its erotic compulsion to control a woman.
Violence at Noon (Nagisa Oshima, 1966): 3.5/5
Violently radical editing and mise en scene—as well as fragmented and elliptical storytelling—animate this sweaty tale of willful love, sex, murder, rape and suicide. The most disturbing thing isn’t the behavior of the murdering rapist but the fact that two different women are in love with him despite this fact.
Death by Hanging (Nagisa Oshima, 1968): 3/5
A satiric condemnation of the death penalty. A man is executed by hanging, but his body refuses to die. They bring him down, but now he doesn’t remember the crimes he is accused of. The priest says his soul is already in heaven and that now he is a different person. Soon the prison officials are acting out his crimes out in front of him, trying to jog his memory—until they seem to empathize to his thoughts and deeds to the extent that they perform them themselves. Thereafter follows another argument against him being executed—that he was poor and Korean: mistreated and living largely within his own imagination until the reality and imagination mixed. Dreamlike and cosmic.
Boy (Nagisa Oshima, 1969): 3/5
A brutal and pitiless portrait of a couple of scammers and their 10-year-old son who has seen it all. The wife and boy take turns being grazed by passing cars to extort money. Comparable to my beloved Maurice Pialat in its unflinching portrait of a child in a bad situation (and indeed L’Enfance Nue came out the year before). Our title character tries to run away or think of himself as an alien, but his mother and father are the only ones he has.
Adoption (Márta Mészáros, 1975): 3/5
Forty-year-old Kata decides she wants a child, but her lover has a wife and children and doesn’t want more. When she strikes up a relationship with a (ravishingly beautiful) 18-year-old from a local orphanage, she realizes there are other options. A simple story told with an emphasis on Kata’s emotions and inner life. Since it’s Hungary in 1975, everyone is a little sad and depressed, naturally.
Book Nook
42nd Parallel, part one of The U.S.A. Trilogy (John Dos Passos, 1930)
Broad rather than deep. Presents the biographies of about 12 regular people between about 1890 and 1910, giving a panorama of the country at that time. Often it sets out the whole story of their lives, so there is plenty of event. But the prose is sort of emotionless—like something you would read in an obit. There is much talk about socialism, the pervasiveness of which is startling compared to today’s environment, where it is only spit out as the worst kind of insult.
The Odyssey, books 1-4, 9-12, 15, 22-24 (Homer, ~700 BC)
A re-read, and this is pretty much all the good stuff. The Lotus-Eaters, the Cyclops, the bag of winds, Cerce, Odysseus’ trip to the underworld, the Sirens, Scylla and Charybdis, and Odysseus slaughtering all the suitors in the palace upon his return. Despite all this event, I can’t help thinking Nolan’s version is going to be a self-serious slog.
Animal Farm (George Orwell, 1945)
Truly sickening how closely Thump adheres to Napolean the Pig’s strategies. Arbitrarily demonize former allies (here Snowball) and blame outsiders to distract and unite your followers. Cultivate a personality cult and gradually erode checks on your power. Demand personal loyalty rather than loyalty to any ideology (which is circumstantial at best). Attack independent sources of information and encourage supporters to accept your version of events over objective facts. Rise to power by attacking elites, then gradually become indistinguishable from the power structure you once claimed to oppose.